NEWS

Undertourism: Who’s suffering, and why?

Gemini AI-generated image prompted by the headline of this post: Undertourism: "Who's suffering, and why?" Per Gemini: "This image uses the well-known 'tip of the iceberg' metaphor. The beautiful, stable tip above the water represents the visible, successful luxury end of the tourism industry. Below the surface, however, the massive, unseen foundation is fracturing and breaking apart, symbolising the hidden suffering of the smaller, foundational players who support the entire structure." “GT” cropped it and added the words.

Do you value diversity of opinion and perspective? Share yoursDo you value diversity of opinion and perspective? Share yours

Under­tour­ism: Who’s suf­fer­ing, and why?


‘Undertourism is both a challenge and an opportunity’

Chris Kittishinnakuppe, Head of Marketing & Sales, VHG Hospitality Asia, Thailand

Under­tour­ism — char­ac­ter­ised by an insuf­fi­cient num­ber of vis­it­ors to sus­tain vital tour­ism-depend­ent sys­tems — is a grow­ing con­cern for remote des­tin­a­tions. At Car­damom Ten­ted Camp in Cam­bod­ia, under­tour­ism has a dir­ect impact on both con­ser­va­tion and the well-being of the loc­al community.

Chris Kittishinnakuppe, YAANA VenturesChris Kittishinnakuppe, YAANA Ventures
Chris Kit­tish­in­nak­uppe

Our eco-camp sits in the heart of the Car­damom Moun­tains, pro­tect­ing 18,000 hec­tares of rain­forest along­side Wild­life Alli­ance rangers. Vis­it­or fees help fund patrols that deter poach­ing and illeg­al log­ging. When guest num­bers drop, so does the fin­an­cial sup­port for these essen­tial operations.

Under­tour­ism also impacts the live­li­hoods of our team and the sur­round­ing vil­lages. Former poach­ers, now employed as rangers, rely on eco-tour­ism for stable incomes. Few­er guests mean few­er guided treks, less demand for loc­al sup­plies, and reduced oppor­tun­it­ies for cul­tur­al exchange.

Part of the chal­lenge lies in our loc­a­tion: deep in the forest, far from Cambodia’s main tour­ism hubs. Our appeal lies in exclus­iv­ity and immer­sion in nature, but without tar­geted mar­ket­ing, we risk being over­shad­owed by more fam­ous destinations.

How­ever, we see under­tour­ism as a chance to offer some­thing rare: com­plete seclu­sion in one of South­east Asia’s last great rain­forests. Dur­ing quieter months, guests enjoy near-private access to trails, wild­life encoun­ters, and con­ser­va­tion activ­it­ies. They spend more time with our rangers, learn­ing first-hand about pro­tect­ing biodiversity.

To address under­tour­ism, we focus on attract­ing niche mar­kets — eco-con­scious trav­el­lers, bird­watch­ers, con­ser­va­tion sup­port­ers — who appre­ci­ate that their vis­it dir­ectly funds forest pro­tec­tion. We share meas­ur­able impact data each year to demon­strate pre­cisely how guest stays con­trib­ute to pre­served hab­it­at and com­munity benefits.

For Car­damom Ten­ted Camp, under­tour­ism is both a chal­lenge and an oppor­tun­ity. With each vis­it­or, we keep the forest stand­ing, live­li­hoods secure, and peace between people and nature alive.

Car­damom Ten­ted Camp is a val­ued “Good Tour­ism” Part­ner.

Back to menu ^

Problems with undertourism are less often considered matters of ‘social justice’

Jim Butcher, Reader, Canterbury Christ Church University, UK; Tourism’s Horizon: Travel for the Millions

There is no doubt ‘over­tour­ism’ expresses real, press­ing prob­lems. As the only industry that requires its con­sumers to travel and stay in anoth­er place to con­sume it, tour­is­m’s cul­tur­al effects — both pos­it­ive and neg­at­ive — deserve spe­cial attention.

But I’d like to make the case for undertourism.

The large major­ity of the world’s pop­u­la­tion are not inter­na­tion­al tour­ists. Vast swathes of the globe receive few tour­ists, and pro­duce few­er. Why? Poverty. It’s almost an iron law of his­tory that as soci­et­ies get rich­er, people take hol­i­days. Equally, most people travel to places where there is infra­struc­ture and security. 

It is fash­ion­able for experts and com­ment­at­ors — espe­cially in the uni­ver­sit­ies — to view tour­ism in a one-sided way. Prob­lems with too much tour­ism — and admit­tedly there are a fair few prob­lems — become defin­ing. Com­munit­ies are often presen­ted as vic­tims, and self-styled ‘social justice’ aca­dem­ics seek to pro­tect them from the rav­ages of mass tour­ism. (Although, when asked, it usu­ally turns out that most loc­als do not see it that way). 

By con­trast, prob­lems with too little tour­ism are less often con­sidered mat­ters of ‘social justice’. Have you seen the art­icle on how devel­op­ing the Erit­rean coast could pro­spect­ively con­trib­ute to social pro­gress? No, nor have I. Or the piece about the com­munity cam­paign to double tour­ism to the Orkney Island of Stron­say to stop depop­u­la­tion? Nope.

But they should be con­sidered, and per­haps seen as ‘under­tour­ism’. An older tra­di­tion of social justice sought to ‘level up’ by gen­er­al­ising the good things wealth can bring. ‘Under­tour­ism’ could be invoked to make the case.

PS: I under­stand there has been a back and forth over who ‘inven­ted’ the term, ‘over­tour­ism’. For the avoid­ance of doubt, the first usage of ‘under­tour­ism’ was in Spiked, by me. No trade­mark sought! Use it wisely.

Tourism’s Hori­zon: Travel for the Mil­lions is a val­ued “Good Tour­ism” Part­ner.

Back to menu ^

‘Severe consequences’ at the lower end of Bhutan’s value chain

Dorji Dhradhul, author and creativist, Bhutan (former Director General, Bhutan Tourism)

While tour­ism is often framed by the risks of over­tour­ism — crowds, com­modi­fic­a­tion, and degrad­a­tion — the oppos­ite phe­nomen­on, under­tour­ism, is equally pain­ful, par­tic­u­larly in Bhutan’s present context. 

For nearly three years, dur­ing the COVID-19 shut­downs, Bhutan’s tour­ism industry came to a stand­still. When tour­ism finally reopened, the rebound was slower than expec­ted. Glob­al travel pat­terns had shif­ted, and Bhutan, like many des­tin­a­tions, faced a linger­ing hes­it­a­tion from travellers.

It is also believed that Bhutan’s delib­er­ate High Value, Low Volume (HVLV) policy — anchored in sus­tain­ab­il­ity and cul­tur­al pre­ser­va­tion — also played a role. The increase in the Sus­tain­able Devel­op­ment Fee (SDF), while aligned with Bhutan’s long-term vis­ion, has made the coun­try less access­ible to budget-con­scious travellers. 

Togeth­er, these factors have deepened the under­tour­ism effect, with severe con­sequences for those at the lower-budget end of the tour­ism value chain:

  • Small and budget accom­mod­a­tion pro­viders.
  • Small tour oper­at­ors, and those who catered to budget-con­scious tourists.
  • Loc­al com­munit­ies in less-fre­quen­ted areas, as few­er tour­ists mean few­er oppor­tun­it­ies for homestays, han­di­crafts, and small-scale services.

In essence, under­tour­ism in Bhutan today has cre­ated a dis­pro­por­tion­ate bur­den on the weak­est links in the tour­ism sup­ply chain. While lux­ury hotels and high-end oper­at­ors are adapt­ing more smoothly, those serving the grass­roots eco­nomy are caught in uncer­tainty. How­ever, I believe this situ­ation is tem­por­ary and that, with­in the next few years, the sec­tor will be stable and thriving. 

The chal­lenge for us is to bal­ance policy ideals with inclus­iv­ity. HVLV is non-nego­ti­able for sus­tain­ab­il­ity in Bhutan, but mech­an­isms — such as tar­geted incent­ives, train­ing, and the diver­si­fic­a­tion of tour­ism products — are needed to ensure that small play­ers are not left behind. Oth­er­wise, the noble pur­suit of mind­ful tour­ism risks cre­at­ing silent cas­u­al­ties with­in its own ecosystem.

Back to menu ^

‘There is no such thing as overtourism or undertourism’

Saverio Francesco Bertolucci, Business Development Specialist, VDB Luxury Properties, Spain

Under­tour­ism can be seen from mul­tiple per­spect­ives. Over­all, this term refers to a com­bin­a­tion of low vis­it­or arrivals and rev­en­ues with respect to the total capa­city and prof­it­ab­il­ity pro­jec­tion of a spe­cif­ic area.

I want to start with the premise that I have to agree with Dimitri­os Buhal­is and Chris Christou (among many) that terms are over­whelm­ingly exploited and lose their mean­ing to the point of becom­ing det­ri­ment­al to find­ing solutions. 

There is no such thing as over­tour­ism or under­tour­ism, but rather the abil­ity or inab­il­ity to keep up with the industry pat­terns and/or dis­rupt­ively trans­form the tour­ism business.

Des­tin­a­tions cur­rently suf­fer­ing from bad tour­ism out­comes are mainly present in low secur­ity zones and in war areas, of course, or they have mar­keted them­selves to inap­pro­pri­ate niches or seg­ments of the market. 

The tour­ism mar­ket­place con­stantly evolves. A destination’s prosper­ity will depend on its com­pan­ies’ skills and know­ledge to adapt and appeal to the right cus­tom­er segments. 

A fur­ther boost or hindrance to the suc­cess of private firms in a des­tin­a­tion is related to gov­ern­ment policies. The alloc­a­tion of funds and the lim­it­a­tions or incent­ives gov­ern­ments place on the industry highly influ­ence demand/supply pat­terns and shape results

My research in Ice­land and the Faroe Islands shows how a lack of infra­struc­ture, and late or poor gov­ern­ment inter­ven­tions, are oth­er factors that dimin­ish chances of sus­tained growth and eco­nom­ic sta­bil­ity from tourism. 

All in all, I hope such gen­er­ic terms will be for­got­ten in the books of the few aca­dem­ics who fre­quently write about them. Those words do not help find the root causes of prob­lems, nor do they help with even­tu­al solutions.

Back to menu ^

Destinations need ‘some semblance of capacity management and control’

K Michael Haywood, publisher, ‘Destinations-in-Action’, Canada

These days every­one is famil­i­ar with what is driv­ing over­tour­ism, but ignores the fact that many com­munit­ies are hem­or­rhaging vis­it­ors for mul­tiple reasons:

  • Clos­ure of man­u­fac­tur­ing plants and oth­er indus­tries, includ­ing many retail­ers, that decim­ate cor­por­ate and loc­al markets.
  • No re-invest­ment in loc­al tour­ism-related infra­struc­ture, place­mak­ing, attrac­tions, recre­ation­al and nature-based areas.
  • Declines in the vibrancy and func­tion­al­ity of pub­lic spaces, their appeal and attractiveness.
  • Dis­rup­tions in access­ib­il­ity.
  • Safety and secur­ity con­cerns.
  • Degrad­ing qual­ity not only of phys­ic­al prop­er­ties but also in the pro­vi­sion of vis­it­or services.
  • Cut­backs in fund­ing for DMOs, cul­tur­al attrac­tions, his­tor­ic sites.
  • Ignor­ance as to what vis­it­ors desire and enjoy. 
  • Neg­at­ive word-of-mouth reviews espe­cially on social media platforms.

When the capa­cit­ies of exist­ing tour­ism-related enter­prises aren‘t filled bey­ond typ­ic­al break-even points, many close, go into receiv­er­ship, declare bank­ruptcy, or pivot in search of new mar­kets. Com­munit­ies depend­ent on vis­it­or flows inev­it­ably slide into fur­ther decline when degrowth descends.

In con­trast, and to my mind, under­tour­ism does not rep­res­ent and should not char­ac­ter­ise the act of devel­op­ing or dis­cov­er­ing less­er-known places that offer authen­t­ic and sus­tain­able exper­i­ences for both trav­el­lers and loc­al com­munit­ies. What is (or should be) being prac­ticed is lim­its-to-growth man­age­ment designed to cur­tail access, pre­vent over-devel­op­ment, and to try to remain sustainable.

In either regard, what is required is some semb­lance of capa­city man­age­ment and con­trol; find­ing the right bal­ance between demand and sup­ply. Such a stance or require­ment doesn‘t simply reside in plan­ning doc­u­ments but in the pur­pose of a com­munity or a des­tin­a­tion; a pur­pose that must be achieved and activ­ated through strategies that identi­fy appro­pri­ate out­comes desired by communities.

Back to menu ^

What do you think? 

In a com­ment below share your own thoughts about under­tour­ism

SIGN IN or REGISTER first. (After sign­ing in you will need to refresh this page to see the com­ments section.) 

Or write a “GT” Insight or “GT” Insight Bite of your own. The “Good Tour­ism” Blog wel­comes diversity of opin­ion and per­spect­ive about travel & tour­ism, because travel & tour­ism is everyone’s business.

This is an open invit­a­tion to travel & tour­ism stake­hold­ers from any back­ground to share their thoughts in plain Eng­lish with a glob­al industry audience.

“GT” doesn’t judge. “GT” pub­lishes. “GT” is where free thought travels.

If you think the tour­ism media land­scape is bet­ter with “GT” in it, then please … 

Back to menu ^

Previous “GT” Insight Bites

  • Tour­ism, war, and peace
  • Sig­nalling or sub­stance in tour­ism: What’s your take?
  • Vis­it­or value, val­ues, volume: What’s good where you are?
  • Out­bound doesn’t care about sus­tain­ab­il­ity | Well-being must include meaning
  • Is a travel & tour­ism career still attract­ive? Import­ant things to under­stand in 2025
  • Wish­wash­ing tourism
  • Butler’s conun­drum: Air travel and ‘sus­tain­able’ tourism
  • What is tourism’s biggest oppor­tun­ity and/or threat where you are in 2025?
  • “GT” Insight Bites: Nostalgia
  • “GT” Insight Bites: Geo­pol­it­ics and tourism
  • Tour­ism stake­hold­ers: Who has an out­sized voice? Who has no voice? Who cares?
  • Would you abol­ish taxes on tips?
  • Three crit­ics walk into a bar …
  • How are emer­ging tech­no­lo­gies trans­form­ing the travel & tour­ism industry?
  • What does it mean to be crit­ic­al of tourism?
  • What con­sti­tutes ‘pro­gress’ for travel & tour­ism in 2024?
  • Con­sid­er­ing a career in tour­ism? Import­ant things you should know in 2024
  • What did tour­ism learn from the COVID-19 pandemic?
  • In 2024, what are the best oppor­tun­it­ies for tour­ism over the next five years?
  • Tourism’s biggest chal­lenges & threats over the next five years to 2028
  • On empower­ment, pro­mo­tion, and the power of expression
  • On enrich­ment, repat­ri­ation, the double-edged blade, and war
  • On tour­ism tech­no­logy, pro­gress, and loc­al benefit-sharing
  • Hey, travel & tour­ism, are you ‘neo­co­lo­ni­al­ist’?
  • Who’s the new boss? Asia Pacific tour­ism industry asso­ci­ation seeks leader
  • ‘The hos­pit­al­ity industry offers a great career.’ Really?
  • Cruise ships: Bless­ing or blight?
  • Tour­ist vs trav­el­ler: What’s the difference?
  • The heads of fin­ance, oper­a­tions, and PR walk into their boss’s office … 
  • Yes, Tour­ism Minister
  • What are tourism’s biggest chal­lenges & threats over the next five years?
  • ‘Tour­ism is built on the back­bone of white suprem­acy’. What do you think?
  • Really, what’s the dif­fer­ence? ‘Sus­tain­able tour­ism’ vs ‘regen­er­at­ive tourism’
  • Want a career in tour­ism? Import­ant things you should know
  • Diverse per­spect­ives on travel & tour­ism and a fairer world
  • Diverse per­spect­ives on eco­nom­ic degrowth and tourism
  • Diverse per­spect­ives on vis­it­or dispersion

Featured image (top of post)

Gem­ini AI-gen­er­ated image promp­ted by the head­line of this post: Under­tour­ism: “Who’s suf­fer­ing, and why?” Per Gem­ini: “This image uses the well-known ‘tip of the ice­berg’ meta­phor. The beau­ti­ful, stable tip above the water rep­res­ents the vis­ible, suc­cess­ful lux­ury end of the tour­ism industry. Below the sur­face, how­ever, the massive, unseen found­a­tion is frac­tur­ing and break­ing apart, sym­bol­ising the hid­den suf­fer­ing of the smal­ler, found­a­tion­al play­ers who sup­port the entire structure.” 

“GT” cropped it and added the words.

Top ^

Related Articles

Back to top button